|
|
If
you would like to watch other IEST presentations by Wayne
via Webex, please click on the links below:
October
15, 2002 - What is Resonance all about?
December 3, 2002
- Measurement and Analysis
January 21, 2003
- Vibration Aspects of Reliability Enhancement via HALT, ESS
and HASS
Nov 18, 2003 - Fixtures
for Vibration and Shock Testing
December 9,
2003 - Resonance can damage your hardware
Vibration
Testing and Screening of PCBs
by Wayne Tustin
(May 6, 2003)
 |
| |
|
All
vibration training commences here, with the SDoF or
single degree of freedom idea. One mass. One spring.
One dashpot or damping (friction) device. And only one
resonance.
Such systems don't exist in the
"real world", although accelerometer and electrodynamic
shaker inner workings resemble the SDoF.
|
| |
Let's
invert that SDoF system and attach it to the vibration
table of a small electrodynamic shaker driven by a power
amplifier (not shown). We've adjusted the "forcing frequency"
of the signal going into the power amplifier to match
the nautral frequency of the spring-mass system. We have
resonant magnification. If this was a video clip, you'd
see that the motion of the spring mass is much larger
than the "input" motion. |
| |
|
This
cantilever beam is much more complicated, and it can
respond in many different ways. One would be the first
or the "dividng board" response. We call this particular
response the second bending mode.
Observe the point of zero translation,
called a node. Observe the area of maximum bending,
called an antinode. That would not be a good location
for a delicate component, if this beam represented a
printed circuit card or PCB.
Most of the time, the response displacements
will be too small for us to see the response. In that
situation, how might we identify what's happening? We
can try sprinkling salt on the beam. Vibration will
cause it to migrate. It will collect at the nodes.
Click on the image to see this
video clip.
You
will need Real Player to watch the video. Just click
here to download it for free.
|
| |
|
Here
we count 8 nodes, so this must be the 9th mode.
How many are resonances there? An
infinite number. Fortunately, only the first 5 or 6
interest us.
Click on the image to see this
video clip.
You
will need Real Player to watch the video. Just click
here to download it for free.
|
| |
 |
| |
|
Thus
far I've been using sine or sinusoidal one-frequency-at-a-time
vibration, nice and predictable, fine for classrooms.
But in many real-world situations, such as this rocket
lift-off, the vibration tends to be ....
Click on the image to see this
video clip.
You
will need Real Player to watch the video. Just click
here to download it for free.
|
| |
|
...
random. By that, I mean that the time history, viewed
on an oscilloscope, will not be nice and predictable
like the familiar sine wave. It will be unpredictable.
I'm not showing it to you here,
but trust me: when the time history, in the time domain,
is unpredictable, its Fourier transform, in the frequency
domain, will be continuous. All frequencies will be
present, as with ...
|
| |
|
...
the white light that here is passing through a prism.
Do you remember this optical demonstration from Physics?
Over on the wall we have a continuous spectrum. All
the colors of the rainbow are present.
Is it possible for vibration to
have a continuous spectrum? Yes!
|
| |
|
Three
accelerometers are attached to an automobile's axle.
Those three signals are seen in the top three records
here.
Now let's do a Fourier Transform
into the frequency domain, with the results shown low
on this slide. Notice that the "Power Spectral Density"
or PSD is quite constant at frequencies 1 - 20 Hz. Then
less constant out to maybe 200 Hz. Notice, please, that
there are no "holes" in this continuouis spectrum. All
frequencies are present in this random, unpredictable
vibration.
|
| |
Build
yourself a demonstrator like mine. A wood block about
3" x 3" x 1" thick. Two 45 degree saw cuts. A bolt to
hold the unit onto a shaker. Two metal reeds having different
thicknesses, different natural frequencies, are clamped,
pointing toward the camera. By doing a slow sine vibration
sweep, we can excite the red reed at its natrual frequency
of 22 Hz, or (a bit later) the white reed at its natural
frequyency of 34 Hz.. Or no reeds. With sine vibration,
there will be no collisions. |
| |
|
But
with broad-spectrum vibration, perhaps 1-100 Hz, we
see that we are simultaneously exciting both resonances.
The reeds occasionally strike.
If we were performing HALT or HASS
here, we would use random vibration because it identifies
failure modes that would never be seen with sine vibration.
Click on the image to see this
video clip.
You will need Real Player to watch the video. Just click
here to download it for free.
|
| |
|
What
did those reeds represent? Well, they could have represented
two of the many cards in this aircraft or shipboard
"card gage". With test lab swept-sine forcing, at certain
test frequencies a card may respond, one at a time.
They don't move far enough to collide with their neighbors.
But with test lab random forcing, all respond at once.
Collisions are inevitable. Just like in flight. Or when
the ship's guns fire.
If the "real world" vibration is
random, our test lab vibration should be random.
|
| |
|
Out
here in California, we worry a little about earthquakes
such as in the bottom trace. Most seismic events are
well under 1g acceleration.
But see how a building responded.
Building resonance makes the center trace much larger,
approaching, sometimes exceeding 1g.
If someone foolishly installed an
equipment having the same natural frequency as the building,
further resonance might well damage that equipment.
Tell your designer friends to remember this commandment:
THOU SHALT NOT STACK THY RESONANCES!
|
| |
|
Let's
talk about printed circuit Boards (PCBs). Here is a
PCB being shaken at the frequency of its first mode,
when shaken at 174 Hz, and later thus, when shaken at
258 Hz, and later thus, when shaken at 341Hz. Sure,
these displacements are exaggerated so that you can
see them here. Can you visualize the damage to the connections
between your components and your PCB, when your PCB
rolls and twists in these modes? This next point may
be difficult for you to accept, but all three modes
will exist simultaneously when the service vibration
is random or when shock is present. All three modes
will exist simultaneously during a random vibration
or a shock test or during developmental vibration screening.
Earlier, when I was talking about
the bending of cantilever beams, did you realize that
I was also talking about your printed circuit boards
(PCBs)? . Perhaps you think of your say 6" x 9" PCBs
as stiff, not likely to bend. How can I help you to
realize that they will bend at certain forcing frequencies?
|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
|

|
| |
|
Animation
2 - Trampoline
Mentally expand your 6" x 9" PCB
to a 10' x 15' trampoline. You can appreciate that if
you shook the trampoline's supporting frame, the trampline
would flex in not only the first mode shone here, but
also in many other modes.
Let's back up to see those modes
again. Your 6" x 9" PCB will respond like these animations.
Courtesy http://store.yahoo.com/aah-trampolines/index.html
|
| |
|
Mr.
Designer, can we help you to improve your PCB designs
so they will withstand all that rolling, bending and
twisting? Yes, come to Santa Barbara June 23-25, and
let ERI's John Starr explain
a new design tool he has developed. Or John can bring
this training to your facility.
Mr. Test Lab Manager, would you like to send a few of
your newer test engineers and technicians to one of
these cities? Or have me come to your facility to train
a larger number? Please ask
me for a proposal.
|
| |
|

Thanks again to B&K and to IEST!
|
| |
 |
|
|
|