|
|
If
you would like to watch other IEST presentations by Wayne
via Webex, please click on the links below:
October
15, 2002 - What is Resonance all about?
December 3, 2002
- Measurement and Analysis
January 21, 2003
- Vibration Aspects of Reliability Enhancement via HALT, ESS
and HASS
May 6, 2003 - Vibration
Testing and Screening of PCBs
December 9, 2003 - Resonance
can damage your hardware
Fixtures
for Vibration and Shock Testing
by Wayne Tustin
(Nov 18, 2003)
 |
| |
| Many
people involved in environmental test belong to IEST
– the Institute of Environmental Sciences and
Technology.
Members and non-members are invited to
participate in writing RPs or Recommended Practices
such as this one dealing with vibration and shock test
fixtures. This RP is available from IEST headquarters
in Rolling Meadows, IL. |
| |
What
is a fixture? It’s
an intermediate structure, bolted to and driven by a
shaker or shock test machine and some device under test
(D.U.T.).
|
| |
| Let’s
examine the moving part of Figure 1, the shaker armature,
the fixture and the D.U.T. (which here we are pretending
is just one mass). At higher test frequencies the shaker
armature behaves like two masses joined by a spring.
An important question: where,
- on the shaker table at A,
- on the fixture at B, or
- on the DUT at perhaps C or D,
shall we locate our control accelerometer?
|
| |
| That’s
an important decision. See Figure 3. The control accelerometer
informs your computer that controls your test what’s
happening out at your shaker.
Where shall we attach the sensor
(control accelerometer)? We must decide at what “input”
location(s) we want to control our test.
Another necessary decision: at
what location(s) on the D.U.T. do we want to record
responses?
If you are responsible for testing,
be sure that these locations are specified. |
| |
At
left, Figure 4, we have a family of transmissibility (mechanical
amplification) curves for an idealized, very simple, spring-mass
system. On the magnified graph at right, a 3000 Hz resonance
is shown at frequency ratio 1. Perhaps we are testing
up to 2,000 Hz, which falls at frequency ratio 0.67. Notice
that our fixture has boosted shaker motion by half. |
| |
| With
our control accelerometer at “B” (back to
Figure 2), that resonant buildup will have prompted
our computer to reduce electrical drive to the shaker
to about 0.67. That’s one reason “B”
is so popular. With control at “B”, our
computer electrically corrects for our fixture’s
mechanical resonance.
|
| |
| Now
let’s talk about our fixture, Figure 5. Probably
the most popular fixture shape is the cube. DUTs can
be attached to five sides and variously oriented with
respect to shaker motion.
|
| |
|
Another
popular shape is the “ell” or “bookend”
fixture. The fixture of Figure 6 suggests fixturing
a car radio. “Input” is one of Figure 2’s
many “B” locations. “Response”
is one of Figure 2’s many “C” or “D”
locations. Test results can change dramatically –
depending upon which “input” and which “response”
location you choose. These (as well as intensity and
frequency) should be specified.
|
| |
|

|
| |
Do
you attempt to hold your DUT in the same manner it will
be held in service? The fixture in Figure 7 supports a
torpedo in somewhat the same way an aircraft would support
it. Figures 8 and 9 suggest alternatives. |
| |
|

|
| |
|
|
| |
|

|
| |
| How
shall we fabricate our fixtures? Beginners try to bolt
plates together. This might work below 50 Hz, but not
to 500 or 2,000 Hz, where vibratory displacements get
down into the microinches and parts can move about,
can rub and rattle. Casting is best, because then we
can use highly damped K1A alloy, the same alloy as used
in many shaker armatures. Casting requires time for
design, for building a model, for casting in sand and
for machining. Welding is the most-used compromise.
|
| |
| If
we are welding, need we chamfer plates, in order to
fully penetrate with our weld material? Generally no.
A fixture is not a pressure vessel. Have your weld shop
clamp the parts. Tack weld, then lay down a heavy bead.
Width “A” should be comparable to plate
thickness. When the bead cools, it will strongly and
rigidly secure the fixture parts.
|
| |
| Place
inserts such as shown in Figure 12 into drilled holes
in your aluminum or magnesium fixtures (soft material)
for strongly bolting your DUTs.
|
| |
| How
might a test change if you relocate your control accelerometer?
This is a fairly lengthy story, and this slide lacks
sufficient space.
|
| |
| When
an adapter plate or a fixture has served its purpose
and is full of holes, recycle it. Don’t compromise
your testing by continuing to use junk.
|
| |
| Do
you need to shake a number of circuit cards that are
destined to serve in a “card cage”? You
might want to strengthen an actual “card cage”,
as in Figure 15.
|
| |
 |
| |
Another
way to hold circuit cards so that all receive the same
vibration is shown in Figure 17. |
| |
I’d
like to make sure that everyone out there knows that I
teach about vibration and shock testing, as well as measurement,
analysis and calibration. Here is a listing of “open”
courses presently scheduled. Just one more this year,
at Chatsworth, near Los Angeles, commencing tomorrow morning.
Where else would you like me to teach? |
| |
Some
of you know that for the last couple of years I’ve
been writing a new book, shown at the right. A few copies
of my 1984 book are offered at Amazon.com.
Chapter 26 deals with fixtures. |
| |

Thanks again to B&K and to IEST! |
| |
 |
|
|
|